Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2003 12:38 pm
Fine with me and that means draft night will be about 45 mins shorter.
Page 2 of 4
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:32 pm
Are we going to go through with the 23 player roster idea?
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:54 am
i'm ok with it........
it would only cause more parity in the leagues...., but it would affect me, because i always stash away top quailty backups (well, except for my quarterbacks...they always suck!)
it would only cause more parity in the leagues...., but it would affect me, because i always stash away top quailty backups (well, except for my quarterbacks...they always suck!)
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 5:10 pm
Not for it.
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 9:59 pm
not for it either!!!
now we need 3 more against it smallwood!
now we need 3 more against it smallwood!
Roster Size
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:26 am
23 is ok with me. 
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 8:22 am
Shortening the roster = shortening the draft. The draft is something that I look forward to. Also, isn't a little close to the season to be trimming the roster?
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 4:27 pm
Like you were even paying attention in rounds 17 & 18 last year anyway! After the Draft you can hang around and have another beer or two and we'll all form a circle and sing songs together. League Bonding! Michael row your boat ashore.
We have plenty of time to change this rule. We will probably still be arguing about it right up to the start of the draft. And don't give me any crap about it affecting your draft strategy.
We have plenty of time to change this rule. We will probably still be arguing about it right up to the start of the draft. And don't give me any crap about it affecting your draft strategy.
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 4:43 pm
It will; and I was paying attention in rounds 17 & 18.
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 2:36 am
ok....without looking who did you take in the 17th and 18th rounds of last years drafts?