Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:19 pm
Well, that's still a good example of some stupid shit you've done.
Infamous...celibacy palsy.
Infamous...celibacy palsy.
Page 3 of 9
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:49 pm
tell us what you traded for that pick since the transactions are no longer available...
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:24 pm
stop brown-nosing oompa
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:59 pm
are we down to "0" yet???
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:02 pm
Oompa Midgets wrote:are we down to "0" yet???
if we are talking about the amount of dates you have been on in the last 4 years, then yes, the number is at "0" !
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:25 pm
well, first off you are wrong as usual...
second, i don't waste my time and money on stupid bitches! when/if the right girl comes along, so be it!
i'm old and independent...i've made it this long so don't worry bout me, i'll be just fine!
you need a woman to take care of the manly duties that you cannot accomplish! i feel sorry for amber!
second, i don't waste my time and money on stupid bitches! when/if the right girl comes along, so be it!
i'm old and independent...i've made it this long so don't worry bout me, i'll be just fine!
you need a woman to take care of the manly duties that you cannot accomplish! i feel sorry for amber!
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:03 pm
I understand the reason for HFA. But I do believe there should be a reduction in the number of points. I like the number 3. A full touchdown and 10 yards seems like alot. How many votes away are we on this every year anyway?? We have 2 months to try to get some swing votes.
And I do agree with what Smallwood said earlier in these posts. No matter what the rules are, the managers that are more diligent in improving their teams will always be on top. For example: like Dave that was kicked out this year....he tried to draft Curtis Martin last year and Will basically told him he was a dumbass cause he was going to be on IR all year. He switched his pick and chose someone else. Who didnt know Martin's knee was fucked?? There will never be "parity" in this league no matter how the rules are tweaked. Ive tried to make my team better and Ernie seems like he will too so maybe we will get more competitive!!
Well, with all that being said.....Im sorry Smallwood....I will now go make my own league or play Madden....lol
And I do agree with what Smallwood said earlier in these posts. No matter what the rules are, the managers that are more diligent in improving their teams will always be on top. For example: like Dave that was kicked out this year....he tried to draft Curtis Martin last year and Will basically told him he was a dumbass cause he was going to be on IR all year. He switched his pick and chose someone else. Who didnt know Martin's knee was fucked?? There will never be "parity" in this league no matter how the rules are tweaked. Ive tried to make my team better and Ernie seems like he will too so maybe we will get more competitive!!
Well, with all that being said.....Im sorry Smallwood....I will now go make my own league or play Madden....lol
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:34 pm
i bet you suck at Madden also
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:57 pm
Chew on this.
Since 2002 the average NFL score has been Away Team 19.7142 to Home Team 22.2843. The difference is 2.5701 which is about 13% of the Away Team score (meaning without home field advantage).
In the MTFFL the average score is 118.85. Our measly 7 points is less than 6% of this sum. So our so-called HFA is less than half of the NFL home field advantage.
Since 2002 the average NFL score has been Away Team 19.7142 to Home Team 22.2843. The difference is 2.5701 which is about 13% of the Away Team score (meaning without home field advantage).
In the MTFFL the average score is 118.85. Our measly 7 points is less than 6% of this sum. So our so-called HFA is less than half of the NFL home field advantage.
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:36 pm
Woohoo....I like numbers!!!!!!