MTFFL

Your argument that HFA creates dominate teams is wrong. If you want parity, change the rules to force more player turnover.

wolfe wrote:If you want party, drink more miller lite.

ok

Who's argument states that HFA creates dominant teams? Ahh, Wolfe was up past his bed time.

Parity? What the fuck are you on about? If you want parity, ask the owners to give a damn about team management.

bilyeuofbaxter wrote:Who's argument states that HFA creates dominant teams? Ahh, Wolfe was up past his bed time.

It's a thread about HFA and you morons were arguing about the percentage of teams that dominate the playoffs. Sounds like a connection to me.

Whose.

Y'all

yeah, no way we could have gone of course with the thread topic

bilyeuofbaxter wrote:I got tired of hearing this, so I ran some numbers.
Since the II league started there have been 20 playoff spots.
9 of these spots taken by 3 teams = 45% vs 25%
17 of these 20 by six teams = 85% vs 50%
Only 3 teams have won the MTFFLII

ok, i get it now...your use of two different %s made me think you were comparing the two leagues!

i did that to prove my point:

5 teams in the playoffs in the past 5 seasons in I
8 teams in the playoffs in the past 5 seasons in II

like i have said all along, there is more parity in the 2nd league due to the involvement and management of 2nd league owners

Oompa Midgets wrote:yeah, no way would could have gone of course with the thread topic

What? Would could what? Type English, please!