Down with HFA in '07

Oompa Midgets · Post by **Oompa Midgets** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:28 pm

what were gordy and wolfe talking about to get rid of this shit known as home field advantage? what was the compromise? roster limits???

Jonathan S. · Post by **Jonathan S.** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:35 pm

I believe it was position limits which you were against.

Jonathan S. · Post by **Jonathan S.** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:36 pm

Position limits, that was the compromise I agreed to. Not roster limits. Roster limits won't work for a whole slew of arguments I've made in the past.

Jonathan S. · Post by **Jonathan S.** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:37 pm

We talked about this at the Flying Saucer for those of you who don't remember.

Oompa Midgets · Post by **Oompa Midgets** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:42 pm

i meant to say position limits...
while i don't like the idea it would get rid of the thing i hate most while also bringing some parity to this league!!!

Post by **wolfe** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:05 pm

We should schedule meetings every Saturday at the Flying Saucer.

Jonathan S. · Post by **Jonathan S.** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:31 pm

Parity? It won't help parity. You guys are nuts. Parity will only be affected by those who raise their level of management.

Oompa Midgets · Post by **Oompa Midgets** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:35 pm

true, but it does help the owners who are not as involved or fantasy inclined...hurts us who are though!

how about 3 points for HFA???

Jonathan S. · Post by **Jonathan S.** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:05 pm

How about zero points for HFA? Parity will only occur when those who need help, help themselves.

Oompa Midgets · Post by **Oompa Midgets** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:26 pm

i agree smallwood, but you sometimes have to compromise to achieve your goals...